Merge branch 'master' of dev:/home/robin/git/thesis
This commit is contained in:
commit
0e887bb0fc
@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ paper: paper.tex fmmd_design_aide_paper.tex
|
||||
#latex paper.tex
|
||||
#dvipdf paper pdflatex cannot use eps ffs
|
||||
pdflatex paper.tex
|
||||
okular paper.pdf
|
||||
mv paper.pdf fmmd_design_aide_paper.pdf
|
||||
okular fmmd_design_aide_paper.pdf
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove the need for referncing graphics in subdirectories
|
||||
|
@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ $$ \hat{z} = \bigcap_{c \in \mathcal{X}}
|
||||
{interior}
|
||||
(\hat{c})
|
||||
%\; \cup \;
|
||||
\cap % J.Howse correction 25MAR2011
|
||||
\; \cap \; % J.Howse correction 25MAR2011
|
||||
\bigcap_{\hat{c} \in \hat{C}-X}
|
||||
exterior (\hat{c})
|
||||
$$
|
||||
@ -857,24 +857,26 @@ The test case AFE represents the condition where all four engines have failed \c
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||
|
||||
% Elevator Pitch
|
||||
PLD's provide a means to visually model failure modes within {\fgs} and after analysis
|
||||
of the test cases, extract the {\fg}'s common failure symptoms.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Because PLD's model failure modes generally, they are not constrained to
|
||||
any particular discipline.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Most methodologies are aimed at solving problems for a particular discipline,
|
||||
UML for instance is only suitable for modelling software.
|
||||
Most failure mode methodologies are focussed on solving problems for a particular discipline;
|
||||
UML for instance is only suitable for modelling software;
|
||||
FMEA, FMEDA and FMECA are good at modelling
|
||||
electronic and mechanical systems, but struggle with software.
|
||||
%
|
||||
FTA models all systems, but from the top down, and rarely giving complete coverage
|
||||
FTA models all systems, but from the top down rarely giving complete coverage
|
||||
to all base component failure modes.
|
||||
%
|
||||
PLD's can be used to model Mechanical, Electrical and Software
|
||||
failure modes. More importantly the interfaces between these disciplines can be modelled
|
||||
seamlessly.
|
||||
failure modes. More importantly the interfaces between these disciplines can be modelled
|
||||
seamlessly. The bottom-up nature of its associated methodology, Failure Mode Modular De-Composition (FMMD)
|
||||
ensures that complete coverage of all base~component failures modes
|
||||
can be ensured.
|
||||
% Elevator Pitch
|
||||
|
||||
%\pagebreak[4]
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user