POST CONDITIONS
This commit is contained in:
parent
7746317e42
commit
08fad4c2f9
@ -136,6 +136,20 @@ be executed.
|
||||
%
|
||||
In implementation code, a pre-condition violation should cause
|
||||
an error to be generated, and thus a post condition to fail.
|
||||
%
|
||||
A function can fail for reasons other than the
|
||||
a failure of one the variables/inputs or functions that it calls.
|
||||
Variables can become corrupted, by radiation affecting RAM or
|
||||
by another software function erroneously overwriting variables.
|
||||
Current work on software FMEA generally focuses on mapping
|
||||
variable corruption to failure modes~\cite{procsfmea,procsfmeadb,sfmeaauto,sfmea}.
|
||||
However, errors other than variable corruption can occur,
|
||||
for instance a microprocessor may have subtle bugs in its instruction set or
|
||||
incorrectly handled
|
||||
interrupt contention could cause side effects in software.
|
||||
For the failure mode model of any software function
|
||||
we must consider all failure modes of post condition
|
||||
violations as well as those caused by `components'.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Mapping contract `invariant' violations to symptoms and failure modes.}
|
||||
@ -419,6 +433,7 @@ With these failure modes, we can analyse our first functional group, see table~\
|
||||
|
||||
5: $ADC_{LOW}$ & output low & $LOW$ \\
|
||||
6: $ADC_{HIGH}$ & output high & $HIGH$ \\ \hline
|
||||
7: post condition fails & software fails & $V\_ERR$ \\ \hline
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
@ -509,6 +524,8 @@ We now analyse this hardware/software combined {\fg}.
|
||||
|
||||
5: $CMATV_{LOW}$ & output low & $LOW$ \\ \hline
|
||||
|
||||
6: post condition fails & software fails & $VV\_ERR$ \\ \hline
|
||||
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user